You are here: Home > Johnson v Riley
Table of Contents:
Johnson v. Riley -- Plaintiffs' reply on motion for clarification and reconsideration
Johnson v. Riley -- Defendants' response to motion for clarification
Johnson v. Riley -- Plaintiffs' motion for clarification and reconsideration
Johnson v. Riley -- order setting briefing and argument on motion to dismiss
Johnson v. Riley -- motion to dismiss and our response
Johnson v. Riley -- amended motion for prelimary injunction
Johnson v. Riley -- appointment of the 3-judge court
Johnson v. Riley -- denial of TRO
Johnson v. Riley -- motion for TRO
Johnson v. Riley -- motion for prelimary injunction
We have filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and brief in Johnson v. Riley. The complaint is found here.
Johnson v. Riley -- Section 5 suit filed (complaint attached)
The Tuscaloosa News reports on a new voting rights suit filed by James U. Blacksher, Fred D. Gray, and Edward Still: Local politicians in Greene and Macon counties have joined to file a federal lawsuit claiming that Gov. Bob Riley's bingo raids are perpetuating racial injustice by thwarting the intent of black voters.
The suit, filed Thursday, was intended to reopen Greenetrack and avoid a raid at Victory-Land in Macon County. The raid appears imminent after the state Supreme Court on Friday gave the governor's anti-gambling task force a green light.
Voting rights lawyer Ed Still is one of several attorneys who filed the lawsuit over the June raid and confiscation of more than 800 bingo machines from the Greenetrack bingo casino in Greene County.
Still said on Friday that Riley never got clearance from the U.S. Justice Department to take action against Greene and Macon counties, which have local constitutional amendments approved by voters authorizing bingo.
The lawsuit's premise is simple: Riley's actions reversed voter intentions in both counties, effectively canceling their votes. Read the whole story --> Suit claims bingo raids thwart black voters | TuscaloosaNews.com